New Wind and Solar Power Is Cheaper Than Existing Coal in Much of the U.S., Analysis Finds

https://insideclimatenews.org/news/25032019/coal-energy-costs-analysis-wind-solar-power-cheaper-ohio-valley-southeast-colorado

Coal-fired power plants in the Southeast and Ohio Valley stand out. In all, 74% of coal plants cost more to run than building new wind or solar, analysts found.

Not a single coal-fired power plant along the Ohio River will be able to compete on price with new wind and solar power by 2025, according to a new report by energy analysts.

The same is true for every coal plant in a swath of the South that includes the Carolinas, Georgia, Alabama and Mississippi. They’re part of the 86 percent of coal plants nationwide that are projected to be on the losing end of this cost comparison, the analysis found.

See Also:  Energy Execs’ Tone on Climate Changing, But They Still See a Long Fossil Future Trump Budget Calls for Slashing Clean Energy Spending, Again


Original Title: New Wind and Solar Power Is Cheaper Than Existing Coal in Much of the U.S., Analysis Finds
Full Text of the Original Article: https://insideclimatenews.org/news/25032019/coal-energy-costs-analysis-wind-solar-power-cheaper-ohio-valley-southeast-colorado